In the United States, periods
and commas go inside quotation marks regardless of logic.
Further punctuation around quoted speech or phrases depends on
how it fits into
the rest of your text.
When an attribution of speech comes in the middle of quoted language,
set it apart as you
would any parenthetical element:
"I don't care," she said, "what you think about it."
Be careful, though, to begin a new sentence after the attribution
if sense calls for it:
"I don't care," she said. "What do you think?"
Convention normally insists that a new paragraph begins with each
change of speaker:
"I don't care what you think anymore," she said, jauntily tossing
back her hair and looking askance at Edward. "What do you mean?"
he replied. "What do you mean, 'What do I mean?'" Alberta sniffed.
She was becoming impatient and wished that she were elsewhere. "You
know darn well what I mean!" Edward huffed. "Have it your way," Alberta
added, "if that's how you feel."
In reporting "silent speech"—noting that language is "said," but
internally and not spoken out
loud—writers are on their own. Writers can put quotation marks
around it or not:
Oh, what a beautiful morning, Curly said to himself. "Oh, what
a beautiful morning!" Curly said to himself.
Be careful not to use quotation marks in an attempt to emphasize
a word (the kind of thing
you see in grocery store windows—Big "Sale" Today!). Underline
or italicize that word
instead. (The quotation marks will suggest to some people that
you are using that word in a
special or peculiar way and that you really mean something else—or
that your sale is entirely
bogus.
When two ideas come together and either one of them can stand by itself, as its own, independent sentence, the following kinds of punctuation are possible. (Review, also, the sections on Coherence: Transitions Between Ideas and on avoiding Run-on Sentences.)
1) Period + start a new sentence
My grandmother refuses to go to bed early. She thinks she's going to
miss out on some of the action.
2) Comma + a cute little conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet,
or, so)
My grandmother refuses to go to bed early, and I'm afraid she's going
to catch a bad cold.
3) Semicolon by itself. Where you have used a semicolon, you could have used a period, but the semicolon, you felt, is better (probably because the independent clauses are so closely related and nicely balanced).
In spite of her cold, my mother refuses to go to bed early; she
is afraid she will miss something.
4) Semicolon + big ugly conjunction or other transitional expression
(however, moreover, nevertheless, therefore, as a result, consequently
. . . ) followed by a comma.
My mother has stayed up late four nights in a row; as a result,
she cannot seem to get well.
A SENTENCE FRAGMENT fails to be a sentence in the
sense that it cannot stand by itself. It does not contain even one independent
clause. There are several reasons why a group of words may seem to act
like a sentence but not have the wherewithal to make it as a complete thought.
It may locate something in time and place with a prepositional
phrase or a series of such phrases, but it's still lacking a proper subject-verb
relationship within an independent clause: In Japan, during the last war
and just before the armistice. accomplishes a great deal in terms of placing
the reader in time and place, but there is no subject, no verb.
It describes something, but there is
no subject-verb relationship: Working far into the night in an effort to
salvage her little boat. This is a verbal phrase that wants to modify something,
the real subject of the sentence (about to come up), probably the she who
was working so hard.
It may have most of the makings of a sentence but still be missing an important part of a verb string: Some of the students working in Professor Espinoza's laboratory last semester
Remember that an -ing verb form without an auxiliary form to accompany it can never be a verb.
It may even have a subject-verb relationship, but it has been subordinated to another idea by a dependent word and so cannot stand by itself: Even though he had the better arguments and was by far the more powerful speaker. This sentence fragment has a subject, he, and two verbs, had and was, but it cannot stand by itself because of the dependent word (subordinating conjunction) even though. We need an independent clause to follow up this dependent clause: . . . the more powerful speaker, he lost the case because he didn't understand the jury.
A RUN-ON SENTENCE has at least two parts, either one of which can stand
by itself (in other words, two independent clauses), but the two parts
have been smooshed together instead of being properly connected. Review,
also, the section which describes Things That Can Happen Between Two Independent
Clauses.
It is important to realize that the length of a sentence really has
nothing to do with whether a sentence is a run-on or not; being a run-on
is a structural flaw that can plague even a very short sentence: The sun
is high, put on some sun-block
An extremely long sentence, on the other hand, might be a "run-off-at-the-mouth"
sentence, but it can be otherwise sound, structurally. Click here to see
a 239-word sentence that is a perfectly fine sentence (structurally).
When two independent clauses are connected by only a comma, they constitute
a run-on sentence that is called a comma-splice. The example just above
(about the sun-block) is a comma-splice. When you use a comma to connect
two independent clauses, it must be accompanied by a little conjunction
(and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so). The sun is high, so put on some sun-screen.
Run-on sentences happen typically under the following circumstances:
a.When an independent clause gives an order or directive
based on what was said in the prior independent clause: This
next chapter has a lot of difficult information in it, you should start
studying right away
(We could put a period where that comma is and start a new
sentence. A semicolon might also work there.)
b.When two independent clauses are connected by a transitional
expression (conjunctive adverb) such as however, moreover, nevertheless.
Mr. Nguyen has sent his four children to ivy-league colleges, however,
he has sacrificed his health working day and night in that dusty bakery
(Again, where that first comma appears, we could have used
either a period -- and started a new sentence -- or a semicolon.)
c.When the second of two independent clauses contains a pronoun that connects it to the first independent clause. This computer doesn't make sense to me, it came without a manual. (Although these two clauses are quite brief, and the ideas are closely related, this is a run-on sentence. We need a period where that comma now stands.) Most of those computers in the Learning Assistance Center are broken already, this proves my point about American computer manufacturers. Again, two nicely related clauses, incorrectly connected -- a run-on. Use a period to cure this sentence.
Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two. "He hit the ball, dropped the bat, and ran to first base." You may have learned that the comma before the "and" is unnecessary, which is fine if you're in control of things. However, there are situations when, if you don't use this comma (especially when the list is complex or lengthy), these last two items in the list will try to glom together (like macaroni and cheese). Using a comma between all the items in a series, including the last two avoids this problem.
Use a comma + a little conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so) to connect two independent clauses, as in "He hit the ball well, but he ran toward third base."
Contending that the coordinating conjunction is adequate separation,
some writers will leave out the comma in a sentence with short,
balanced
independent clauses (such as we see in the example just given).
If there is ever any
doubt, however, use the comma, as it is always correct in this
situation.
One of the most frequent errors in comma usage is the placement
of a comma after a
coordinating conjunction. We cannot say that the comma will always
come before the
conjunction and never after, but it would be a rare event, indeed,
that we need to follow a
coordinating conjunction with a comma. When speaking, we do sometimes
pause after the
little conjunction, but there is seldom a good reason to put
a comma there.
See the note below regarding the use of a comma between two independent
clauses when the
second independent clause begins with a parenthetical element
or adverbial clause.
Use a comma to set off introductory elements, as in "Running toward third base, he suddenly realized how stupid he looked."
It is permissible to omit the comma after a brief introductory element
if the omission does not result in Confusion or hesitancy in reading. If
there is ever any
doubt, use the comma, as it is always correct.
Use a comma to set off parenthetical elements, as in "The Founders Bridge,
which spans the Connecticut River, is falling down." By "parenthetical
element," we mean a part of a sentence which can be removed without changing
the essential meaning of that sentence. The parenthetical element is sometimes
called "added information." This is the most difficult rule in punctuation
because it is sometimes
unclear what is "added" or "parenthetical" and what is essential
to the meaning of a sentence.
When a parenthetical element -- an interjection, adverbial modifier,
or even an adverbial clause-- follows a coordinating conjunction used to
connect two independent clauses, we do not put a comma in front of the
parenthetical element.
The Red Sox were leading the league at the end of May, but of course, they always do well in the spring. [no comma after "but"] The Yankees didn't do so well in the early going, but frankly, everyone expects them to win the season. [no comma after "but"] The Tigers spent much of the season at the bottom of the league, and even though they picked up several promising rookies, they expect to be there again next year. [no comma after "and"]